Introductory Topics in Cinematic Expression
Groups and Texts ("Path 2")
"The childish fascination with the everyday miracle is a
very
good
place to start when you make a film [. . .]"
Lars von Trier, interview with Lars Schwander (1983)
the basics / diversity / content & communication / course goals / materials /
assignment calendar / path 1 / path 2 /miscellany
THE BASICS
English
272: Introductory Topics in Cinematic Expression
class location: virtual, asynchronous
instructor: Dr. Paul Marchbanks
e-mail: pmarchba@calpoly.edu
office: 805-756-2159 / building 47 (the "maze"), hallway 35,
office A / 10-11 A.M. Zoom MTWR & by appointment
The United States entertainment industry has recently begun a much-needed transition, altering the kinds of folk hired to stand both in front of and behind the camera. An industry long-dominated by white men has begun hiring a greater assortment of actors, screenwriters, cinematographers, and directors to better reflect the complexity of diverse audience experiences.
These welcome pressures have also begun to revolutionize issues of representation. Once upon a time, an actor demonstrated her artistic prowess by performing an embodied or cultural difference not her own. Today, a sensitive and empowered audience immediately problematizes such performances, questing for more authentic alternatives. What creative license should we accord actors and filmmakers in the twenty-first century? Should there be strictures in place that discourage certain creative endeavors from getting off the ground, or are we content to allow creative types the freedom to generate whatever content they wish? This course will consider such pivotal questions as we examine the history of screen performance both within and outside the United States.
This course will require students to process films in a multi-staged way that will alter, and hopefully enrich, the viewing process:
- Watch my intro. video for a given film at Digging in the Dirt. These short reflections do not provide plot summaries, nor are they traditional film reviews. Instead, they set up a particular topic or theme I encourage viewers to consider when they finally watch the film.
- Look over study questions I've generated for each film, what I call "Points for Reflection," linked from the Path 1 calendar. Do this before watching the film.
- Watch the film closely, taking notes and, occasionally, professional-looking screenshots (no cell phones)--some of which you will use later.
- Watch and take notes on my my video lecture about the film (linked from the Path 1 calendar). Some written assignments require you to avoid reproducing what I've said in both my intro. video and the subsequent video lecture.
DIVERSITY, ACCOMODATION, & ACCESSIBILITY
- This course will present an array of challenging ideas for discussion purposes, some of which you may instinctively applaud, and others which you might find repelling (thematically, stylistically, or ideologically). I encourage you to articulate your own sensibility and perspective while respecting dissenting positions. I regularly award the highest scores to those students who bolster their arguments with ample evidence, clarity, and solid reasoning--even when I personally disagree with their position.
- Recognizing that every student learns differently, I attempt to employ multiple teaching methodogies as I move through each course I teach. If you like a particular day's format, letting me know can help shape my pedagogical strategy.
- Convinced that the classroom environment should enable instead of disabling each student learner, whatever their background and abilities, I have adopted various Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles. If your own circumstances require additional consideration, please let me know.
CONTENT & COMMUNICATION
The films and literature I teach run the gamut of human experience, from the ecstatic and joyful to the degrading and sordid. Many visual and literary artists regularly exercise this kind of topical license, operating under the assumption that representing even the most difficult material can serve a beneficial purpose. One viewer or reader might actually become sensitized to social problems they had hitherto ignored when they encounter such problems dramatized in art. Another might find in a tale’s situations and dialogue helpful analogues for painful things they have themselves experienced: the story, that is, might provide them a voice—useful words and strategies for expressing their own grief and suffering.
Others, however, might be re-traumatized by watching something that hits too close to home because they’re not yet ready to re-experience their pain—even through the medium of fictional art. Or, they might fundamentally disagree with the creators’ representation of challenging subject matter—might be offended by the representation and quickly point to other, more politic and sensitive portrayals of such difficult material. They might even hold that the creator has no right to represent what they have placed in their art because that creator’s own identity factors do not closely enough mirror the elements they have chosen to represent.
Recognizing that even detailed content warnings have limited value, I’d like to supplement them with an open invitation to exercise your freedom to disagree with the perspective of others (incl. myself), and to approach me during office hours or via email with concerns.
COURSE GOALS
- English dept. learning objectives
- to
hone critical thinking and argumentation skills
- to improve students' writing ability and visual literacy
- to deepen
students' comfort with expressing themselves orally and in writing
- to familiarize students with effective interdisciplinary approaches to argumentation
- A Rhetoric of Film, a free OER (open educational resource) text. Download PDFs of chapters here: one, two, three, four, five.
- Subscribe to my free, non-monetized site Digging in the Dirt so you're instantly aware of course-related content when it drops. (The site exists to encourage visitors to delve deeply into challenging literature and films; I don't earn a cent from this.)
- You'll need the funds necessary to legally purchase rent or purchase all "Path 1" films and purchase (not rent) your one "Path 2" film
ASSIGNMENT CALENDAR [200 pts total]
- Tues., July 30 / Student's Personal Introduction, video (10 pts) / Within Our Gates (1920)
- Thurs., Aug. 1 / Screenshot Analyses, written (20 pts) / Freaks (1932)
- Tues., Aug. 6 / Response to Existing Plea, written (10 pts) / Dance, Girl, Dance (1940)
- Thurs., Aug. 8 / Screenshot Analyses, written (20 pts), Wild Strawberries (1957)
- Tues., Aug. 13 / Response to Existing Plea, written (10 pts), Le Bonheur [Happiness] (1965)
- Thurs., Aug. 15 / Screenshot Analyses, written (20 pts), Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
- Tues., Aug. 20 / Impassioned Plea, written (10 pts), Signs (2002)
- Thurs., Aug. 22 / Screenshot Analyses, written (10 pts), Women Talking (2013)
- Fri., Aug. 23 / Term Paper Outline & Video Explanation, written & video (30 pts)
- Sat., Aug. 24 / Detailed Feedback to Path 2 Group Members' Term Paper Outlines, video (20 pts)
- Tues., Aug. 27 / Term Paper, written (60 pts)
- Fri., Aug. 30 / Impassioned Plea, written (20 pts), Prisoners (2022)
PATH 1 Assignments (130 pts of 240 pts total)
- Student's Personal Introduction, video (10 pts): create a profile on YouTube and upload a 3-4 minute video introduction of yourself DUE: 11:59 p.m. on Tues., July 30 (late assignments lose 1 pt per day). Send url to Dr. M via email. Your introduction should include the following three elements:
- share something about yourself you'd like me to know
- identify one favorite film and why you like it--be specific
- discuss one particular scene from our first Path 1 film, Within Our Gates (1920), a scene not addressed by Dr. M in either his intro. video to the film or his lecture video on the film. Managing to embed a relevant screenshot from the scene in your video will boost your grade.
- Screenshot Analyses (80 pts, 20 pts each pair): students will submit, via email, two different pairs of brief, 75-125 word analyses of a Path 1 film (for a total of 150-250 words for each of the four assignments). Go here for assignment details and rubric. Send to Dr. M as attachment via email.
- Responses to Existing Comment, written (20 pts, 10 pts each): find an already existing, posted comment to my video intro. for the assigned film (archived at Digging in the Dirt), a comment that you disagree with, and post your own impassioned, 100-250 word response to this existing comment (not to my video itself). You will complete this assignment when we study Dance, Girl, Dance (1940) and Le Bonheur [Happiness] (1965). These responses will be graded just like impassioned pleas (below), except that you must respond to an existing comment instead of responding directly to my intro. video. Go here for more details.
- Impassioned Pleas, written (20 pts, 10 pts each): students will compose two impassioned pleas of 100-250 words each, posting one to my new intro. video for Signs (2002), and a second to my new intro. video for Prisoners (2013); these will appear at Digging in the Dirt later in the quarter. Go here for more details.
PATH 2 Assignments (110 pts of 240 pts total)
- Path 2 Groups: each student will belong
to a Path 2 group of 2-3 classmates assigned to a particular film that they will engage, individually, through a term paper outline (with video explanation) and the term paper itself. Groups will be assigned in Week 2.
- Term Paper Outline & Video Explanation, written & video (30 pts): each student will individually create and submit a two-page, single-spaced outline (1" margins, 12 point font, Times New Roman) for their term paper and then explain their thesis and argument structure in a 2-3 minute video. Both outline and video will be sent to Dr. M and the student's Path 2 group members simultaneously. For more details on this assignment, go here.
- Term Paper Outline Feedback, video (20 pts): Path 2 group members will provide two, separate 2-3 minute video responses, one for each of their two Path 2 group members' term paper outlines, and send the url for these video responses to both Dr. M and the student author of the outline simultaneously. Please comment on clarity of thesis, organization, and evidence. As you will be familiar with the same Path 2 film, suggest alternative pieces of evidence they might consider using.
- Term Paper (60 pts): an argument which intertwines your Path 2 film and one of our Path 1 films. Your completed and polished, 4-5 page term paper is due by midnight on Tuesday, Aug. 27. (Late term papers will lose 2 pts per day.) For more details on this assignment, go here.
MISCELLANY
Grading: go here for an elaboration of terms used below
A =
94-100
A- =
90-93 |
A (18-20 on 20-pt scale, 5.4-6.0 on 6-pt scale): creative, topically focused, tightly structured, supported with the most convincing evidence, and virtually error-free |
C+ =
77-79
C =
73-76
C- =
70-72 |
C (14-15.9 on 20-pt scale, 4.2-4.79 on 6-pt scale): a relatively focused essay with clear sense of progression from one idea to the next; argument bolstered by some supporting evidence; distracting number of grammatical errors |
B+ =
87-89
B =
83-86
B- =
80-82 |
B (16-17.9 on 20-pt scale, 4.8-5.39 on 6-pt scale): topically focused, tightly structured, supported with solid evidence, and containing just a few stylistic or grammatical bumps |
D =
65-69 |
D (13-13.9 on 20-pt scale, 3.9-4.19 on 6-pt scale): topic clear but ineffectively argued; evidence provided tangentially relates to argument; loose sense of structure; profound difficulties w/ grammar |
|
|
F =
0-64 |
F (0-12.9 on 20-pt scale, 0-3.89 on 6-pt scale): little evidence of effort, or contains plagiarism |
Contact
Take advantage of my office hours. Go here to find an open slot, then email me to reserve that time for an office visit. The fastest way to contact
me if you have a quick question is via email. You can also reach me in my office at 805-756-2159, or in the evening (before 10 p.m.) at 593-0192.
Writing Lab Center
Experienced writers at the Writing and Learning Center (in Kennedy Library, Room 111-C) offer free assistance with writing
assignments for any course. Using this service will improve even the best writer’s
output. If writing remains a challenge for you, you might consider enrolling in ENGL 150, a one-credit writing support course.
Plagiarism and the Honor Code
I encourage you to improve your writing with the help of peers, instructors,
and myself. Remember, however, that all work
you
submit must be your own. (I will occasionally vet student work to verify authorship.) Any paper containing borrowed but undocumented thoughts
or words will receive a failing grade (this includes material created by generative A.I.), and I am obligated to
report all instances of plagiarism to the Vice President
of Student Affairs. Let
me know if you have further questions concerning this important issue.
Christina's World (1948)
Andrew Wyeth
Dr. Paul Marchbanks
pmarchba@calpoly.edu